Thursday, November 5, 2009

Wrestling Sovereign State Economics from the unconstitutional FED.Issuance of State Notes.Getting Back to the Constitution.Reasserting State Sovereign

Wrestling Sovereign State Economics from the unconstitutional FED.Issuance of State Notes.Getting Back to the Constitution.Reasserting State Sovereignty.

A possible solution to State Solvency.Truth.
Document 100.1.3.2.0 31 of 39........"The high office of the President has been used to foment a plot todestroy the Americans freedom and before I leave office I must inform theCitizen of his plight." PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY(10 days before he was murdered)

On June 4, 1963, a virtually unknown Presidential decree, Executive Order 11110, was signed with the authority to basically strip the Federal ReserveBank of its power to loan money to the United States Federal Government atinterest. With the stroke of a pen, President Kennedy declared that theprivately owned Federal Reserve Bank would soon be out of business. TheChristian Common Law Institute has exhaustively researched this matterthrough the Federal Register and Library of Congress and can now safelyconclude that this Executive Order has never been repealed, amended, orsuperceded by any subsequent Executive Order. In simple terms, it is stillvalid.When President John Fitzgerald Kennedy - the author of Profiles inCourage -signed this Order, it returned to the federal government,specifically the Treasury Department, the Constitutional power to create andissue currency -money - without going through the privately owned FederalReserve Bank.President Kennedy's Executive Order 11110 [the full text is displayedfurther below] gave the Treasury Department the explicit authority:"to issue silver certificates against any silver bullion, silver, orstandard silver dollars in the Treasury."
http://www.apfn.net/Doc-100_bankruptcy31.htm

The Federal Reserve Act was ruled Unconstitutional in 1968. The National Banking Act was ruled Unconstitutional.

THE CREDIT RIVER DECISION INTRODUCTION :A Minnesota Trial Court's decision holding the Federal Reserve Act unconstitutional and VOID; holding the National Banking Act unconstitutional and VOID; declaring a mortgage acquired by the First National Bank of Montgomery, Minnesota in the regular course of its business, along with the foreclosure and the sheriff's sale, to be VOID.
http://www.jail4judges.org/JNJ_Library/2005/2005-02-02B.html

On the topic of Governors refusing bailout money earmarked for unemployment benefits:
Issuance of State notes ,for unemployment payments, that are accepted in state and by other states and private individuals as legal tender for all debts public and private,reedemable by bonds or silver or some other real consideration(commodity) is a real remedy. This would require that States and Governors excercise their sovereignity ,guaranteed by the Constitution of the Republic of the USA,considering the Federal Reserve Act was ruled unconstitutional in 1968.
The issuance of State notes will then realized for the payment of unemployment. These notes will be backed by real consideration and be legal tender for the payment of all debts,public and private, within that state and those other states and/or private individuals who would accept ,by faith and actual consideration,their redemptiveness.
The states then would start printing and issuing a interest free/debt free note ,backed by Gold ?(See below).But,then again ,all that gold is being horded after it was acquisitioned for convenience, safety and security reasons ,after outlawing/consolidation/elimination of the domestic ,independent banking system that issued their own notes.

What will be back our notes with? Bonds? Gross Product? Commodity?Consideration is relevant ,as notes are forms of legal tender ,contracts , binding,redeemable for stated amount or consideration..or that is what it used to say. Bonds? Gross Product? Commodity?

Tangibles. Marijuana. For an example. People. For another.
Amsterdam's"GreenHouse" Coffee Shop on the canal , looks sort of like Oklahoma City's Bricktown Canal...be the first state to exercise State Sovereignity and legalize,grow and prosper.Imagine the flocks .

State issued Notes backed by a state commodity. Gross state product. Marijuana in Oklahoma.
Privately and State produced. The Marijuana would be legalized,decriminalized,free.
Another truth.My POT is not illegal.
The Marijuana Stamp Tax Act of 1937 was ruled unconstitutional by the US Supreme Court in 1969 and instructed the Johnson administration to act accordingly.

They didn't,because the Nixon Administration took power and took the same body of law that was the Marijuana Stamp Tax Act and put it under the umbrella of the Dangerous Drugs and Abuse Act of 1970,equalizing it through psychological tactics,misinformation and propaganda with man-made adulterants designed to enslave.
Marijuana was/is not illegal to possess for the private citizen,only for those seeking to make a profit... corporations...etc ., without the Tax Stamp applied to the product..as is tobacco and it's stamp on the single packages of cigarrettes and cartons.
Though the Stamp Tax itself was ruled Unconstitutional due to the fact it allowed "self -incrimination",it is still a federal requirement for the DEA's approval for research /production license .
Another truth.
The Marijuana Tax Act of 1937 imposed an annual occupational tax, with payment reflected by a special tax stamp, on those who dealt in or possessed marijuana. It also imposed a tax upon all transfers of marijuana, with stamps reflecting payment. The Supreme Court held the Act unconstitutional on self-incrimination grounds in 1969.
http://www.milwaukeephilatelic.org/HenakHome/DrugTax.htm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marijuana_Tax_Act

State produced MARIJUANA would be sold and taxed at dispensaries. Commercially produced crops,by private individual State farmers ,for the intent of industrial use(hemp,oil,fiber,food seed...etc) would be taxed at the retail level.

Privately produced and sold marijuana ,through/by private individuals and by private transaction, would not be regulated and would create a cash flow for the state which would eventually/immediately benefit the state with an infusion of real consideration.
Industry would flourish and thousands of people would be put to work,first in the consumption sector(seeders,grafters,harvesters and cleaners) and then secondly,the industrial sector.
Thirdly would be the people indirectly involved and beneficient.

Incorporated,private,public and non profits established as smoke shops,coffe shops and distributors would only be required to pay a minimal tax on product produced by sales and not on inventory.

Viable ,alternative, just remedies are available to bring about the renewal/recovery of creation and humanity.Wrestling control from the MONEY Changers.
First ,the FED.
Getting Back to the Constitution and individual State Sovereignity.Then truly we may become the Republic of the United States of America. United Sovereign States.
What Freedom awaits US(A)!

The Marijuana Stamp Tax Act of 1937 and the Harrison Narcotics Act of 1914 were not intended to criminalize possesion and usage for private individuals or to prohibit private transactions between private individuals. Commerce.
http://www.ushistory.org/Declaration/document/index.htm

When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness
.

Shafer Commission
http://www.csdp.org/news/news/nixon.htm

http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/Library/studies/nc/ncmenu.htm

Very learned men.More so than most.

Yes ...the infamous Harrison Narcotics Act of 1914.
Harrison Narcotics Act 1914
"Far from appearing to be a prohibition law, the Harrison Narcotic Act on its face was merely a law for the orderly marketing of opium, morphine, heroin, ..."
After the Spanish-American War, when the United States War Department took over the chore of governing the Philippine Islands, it inherited a whole system for licensing narcotics addicts and supplying them with opium legally-a system established under Spanish rule.For many years, Britain had been criticized for shipping opium grown in India into China; indeed, two nineteenth-century "opium wars" between Britain and China had been fought over this issue. Many Chinese saw opium from India as unfair cut-rate competition for their home-grown product. American missionaries in China complained that British opium was ruining the Chinese people;"On its face, moreover, the Harrison bill did not appear to be a prohibition law at all. Its official title was "An Act to provide for the registration of, with collectors of internal revenue, and to impose a special tax upon all persons who produce, import, manufacture, compound, deal in, dispense, sell, distribute, or give away opium or coca leaves, their salts, derivatives, or preparations, and for other purposes ."


4 The law specifically provided that manufacturers, importers, pharmacists, and physicians prescribing narcotics should be licensed to do so, at a moderate fee. The patent-medicine manufacturers were exempted even from the licensing and tax provisions, provided that they limited themselves to "preparations and remedies which do not contain more than two grains of opium, or more than one-fourth of a grain of morphine, or more than one-eighth of a grain of heroin . in one avoirdupois ounce."
5 Far from appearing to be a prohibition law, the Harrison Narcotic Act on its face was merely a law for the orderly marketing of opium, morphine, heroin, end other drugs-in small quantities over the counter, and in larger Quantities on a physician's prescription. Indeed, the right of a physician to prescribe was spelled out in apparently unambiguous terms: "Nothing contained in this section shall apply . . . to the dispensing or distribution of any of the aforesaid drugs to a patient by a physician, dentist, or veterinary surgeon registered under this Act in the course of his professional practice only."

The provision protecting physicians, however, contained a joker hidden in the phrase, "in the course of his professional practice only ."
7 After passage of the law, this clause was interpreted by law-enforcement officers to mean that a doctor could not prescribe opiates to an addict to maintain his addiction. Since addiction was not a disease, the argument went, an addict was not a patient, and opiates dispensed to or prescribed for him by a physician were therefore not being supplied "in the course of his professional practice."

Thus a law apparently intended to ensure the orderly marketing of narcotics was converted into a law prohibiting the supplying of narcotics to addicts, even on a physician's prescription."

Many physicians were arrested under this interpretation, and some were convicted and imprisoned. Even those who escaped conviction had their careers ruined by the publicity.

The medical profession quickly learned that to supply opiates to addicts was to court disaster. "
Illinois Medical Journal for June 1926 concluded:
The Harrison Narcotic law should never have been placed upon the Statute books of the United States. It is to be granted that the well-meaning blunderers who put it there had in mind only the idea of making it impossible for addicts to secure their supply of "dope" and to prevent unprincipled people from making fortunes, and fattening upon the infirmities of their fellow men.
By 1936, August Vollmer, former chief of police in Berkeley, California, former professor of police administration at the Universities of Chicago and California, author of a leading textbook on police science, and past president of the International Association of Chiefs of Police wrote:
Stringent laws, spectacular police drives, vigorous prosecution, and imprisonment of addicts and peddlers have proved not only useless and enormously expensive as means of correcting this evil, but they are also unjustifiably and unbelievably cruel in their application to the unfortunate drug victims. Repression has driven this vice underground and produced the narcotic smugglers and supply agents, who have grown wealthy out of this evil practice and who, by devious methods, have stimulated traffic in drugs. Finally, and not the least of the evils associated with repression, the helpless addict has been forced to resort to crime in order to get money for the drug which is absolutely indispensable for his comfortable existence....
Drug addiction, like prostitution and like liquor, is not a police problem; it never has been and never can be solved by policemen. It is first and last a medical problem, and if there is a solution it will be discovered not by policemen, but by scientific and competently trained medical experts whose sole objective will be the reduction and possible eradication of this devastating appetite. There should be intelligent treatment of the incurables in outpatient clinics, hospitalization of those not too far gone to respond to therapeutic measures, and application of the prophylactic principles which medicine applies to all scourges of mankind
.__

Above text from
"The Consumers Union Report on Licit and Illicit Drugs http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/library/studies/cu/cumenu.htm"
by Edward M. Brecher and the Editors of Consumer Reports Magazine, 1972" link above and here

Consumers Union Report on Licit and Illicit Drugs - Table of Contents

________________________________________________________—
The Marijuana Stamp Tax Act was designed on the same lines as the original intent of the Harrison Narcotics Act..."An Act to provide for the registration of, with collectors of internal revenue, and to impose a special tax upon .."

Teodoro Leon III's words and conclusion... But ,of course ,Marijuana and psychedelics are not on the same level as a designed man-made drug that intentionally enslaves beyond the normal human existence ,even though the current and past propaganda would try to lead us to believe that it is equal or potentially more deadly then a synthetic.It is a natural plant,given as a gift from the All- Mighty and taken in such context with such thanks it will ,at the most,leave you lying on the bed with an extreme case of the munchies.But that is why there are so many different hybrids and choices in this beautiful Plant.Sativa's and Indica's.The propaganda is designed to justify the enslavement and profiting off of a peaceful segment of Society.And it's not Evil,the plant ,that is!.

Marijuana Tax Act of 1937 Full Text of the Marihuana Tax Act as passed in 1937
http://www.druglibrary.org/Schaffer/hemp/taxact/mjtaxact.htm


"We may congratulate ourselves that this cruel war is nearing its end. It has cost a vast amount of treasure and blood... It has indeed been a trying hour for the Republic; but I see in the near future a crisis approaching that unnerves me and causes me to tremble for the safety of my country. As a result of the war corporations have been enthroned and an era of corruption in high places will follow, and the money power of the country will endeavor to prolong its reign by working upon the prejudices of the people until all wealth is aggregated in a few hands and the Republic is destroyed. I feel at this moment more anxiety fo the safety of my country than ever before, even in the midst of war. God grant that my suspicions may prove groundless." letter from Lincoln to (Col.) William F. Elkins, Nov. 21, 1864.
By: parhat on 2009/01/20 PM 6:44:46.

You're missing the collection of Lincoln's Paper compiled by Lincoln's lawyer associate which verifies its authenticity. The encyclopedia sanitized the issue of "Classes against the Masses" in p.40 of The Lincoln Encyclopedia by Archer H. Shaw (Macmillan, 150, NY.) and p.954 of Abraham lincoln: A New Portrait,(Vol. 2) by Emanuel Hertz (Horace Liveright Inc. 1931, NY). The original book appeared and compiled by Lincoln's lifelong law partner verifies his statement in "The Hidden Lincoln: from the Letters and Papers of William H. Herndon, by Emanuel Hertz (Viking Press, 1938, NY) which is the authoritative version of Lincoln's papers. This verifies Lincoln's statement as being TRUE. So I did check.

His original statement in full is as follows: "We may congratulate ourselves that this cruel war is nearing its end. It has cost a vast amount of treasure and blood... It has indeed been a trying hour for the Republic; but I see in the near future a crisis approaching that unnerves me and causes me to tremble for the safety of my country. As a result of the war corporations have been enthroned and an era of corruption in high places will follow, and the money power of the country will endeavor to prolong its reign by working upon the prejudices of the people until all wealth is aggregated in a few hands and the Republic is destroyed. I feel at this moment more anxiety fo the safety of my country than ever before, even in the midst of war. God grant that my suspicions may prove groundless." letter from Lincoln to (Col.) William F. Elkins, Nov. 21, 1864.

It would seem that Lincoln have mentioned in many places where Lincoln spoke about Capital and Labor ("Workingmen"), Lincoln also praise the moral rightness of both Capital and Labor but in the context where during his nation, about 7/8 of the population are "self-employed" on their own farms. The idea of self sufficiency may explain how Lincoln served for years as a railroad corporation lawyer with apparently no qualms and pen the name "corporation enthroned" to Elkins. Lincoln also mentioned that "These capitalist generally act harmoniously and in concert to fleece the people, and now that they have got into a quarrel with themselves, we are called upon to appropriate the people's money to settle the quarrel." from a speech to Illinois legislature, Jan 1837, See Vol1, p. 24 of Lincoln's Complete Works, ed. by Nicolay and Hay, 1905)
http://www.de-fact-o.com/fact_read.php?id=110

No comments: